Moon Bow
Colours the night
Sun
Shadows the day
by Zeni 2010
Action is Character
Act so that you have no cause to be ashamed of yourselves; and hold fast to this rule.
Jetsun Milarepa - Tibetan Buddhist Yogi - 1025-1135 AD
Jetsun Milarepa - Tibetan Buddhist Yogi - 1025-1135 AD
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
Sunday, January 24, 2010
Slime Mould redesigns road networks in England and Japan
New Scientist reports on research findings by computer scientists in the UK that suggests slime mould, P. polycephalum, which feeds by spawning tendrils to reach nutrients,will map the most efficient network linking cities from London to Glasgow. This follows Japanese research that used the same technique to map the Tokyo rail network. The findings, published in the journal Science on January 22 2010 are applicable to human built networks as Wolfgang Marwan of Otto von Guericke University in Germany writes, "The model captures the basic dynamics of network adaptability through interaction of local rules, and produces networks with properties comparable to or better than those of real-world infrastructure networks... The work of Tero and colleagues provides a fascinating and convincing example that biologically inspired pure mathematical models can lead to completely new, highly efficient algorithms able to provide technical systems with essential features of living systems, for applications in such areas as computer science."
Sunday, November 29, 2009
First time in Paris
Irene on top of the Arc de Triomphe
Hitch hiking from Amsterdam with my mother, 10 years old and I had never been this high up before. The view down the boulevards from the Arc de Triomphe towards the outer arrondissments and infinity.
Labels:
1954,
Arc,
Arc de Triomphe,
arrondm,
Irene Walls,
paris
Saturday, October 31, 2009
My Paris Walk



Paris
Crossing the Seine
on the timber board bridge
a Sunday
Parisian lovers and friends
Guitars strumming with laughter
Down by the river, boatwaves lapping water on the cobblestones
Poplar trees inscribed by lovers
Their history lives on in the bark
Sunday, November 30, 2008
Thursday, November 27, 2008
The Quest for the missing fore skin. Episode One
My research into this story started when my good friend Ned said, “You know the sculpture of the David, surely Michelangelo knew that David was Jewish and therefore circumcised,” and my conclusion was that he probably did. But he was working for the Catholic Church and couldn’t create a circumcised sculpture. Working in Italy at the time of the Renaissance his model wasn’t circumcised, and I’d say that Michelangelo probably had never seen a circumcised male member, as only the Jews were circumcised in Europe. This made me wonder, are there any circumcised classical sculptures or paintings? Did the Jews ever create a representation of themselves naked?
Having been born during the second world war in Amsterdam, of Jewish parents, I was brought up with horror stories of suspected Jewish men and boys having their pants pulled down on the street to make sure of their lack of foreskin, and then shipped off to concentration camps. (The movie director, Roman Polanski, survived in the Warsaw ghetto by making fake foreskins for his fellow sufferers)
Now I’m living in Australia where most men seem to be circumcised (don’t ask me how I know), when I ask questions of men about their fore skins, I find that most have never thought about it. In my research, only gay men, seeing other male members to compare with their own, seem to have a strong feeling about not having a fore skin, but every man I’ve mentioned it to has been interested in talking about it to me, and not at all in a suggestive way, but purely a philosophical one, which I can’t say for their women, who presume to know about their man’s feelings about his male member. Also the women think that I’m asking questions of the man for flirty reasons, and start point scoring on how many dicks they’ve seen. Such are the difficulties in research of this kind. The women who had experienced different dick's related some differences of physical aspect such as fore skins creating more lubrication and feeling softer. I say, what does it matter anyway, it’s the motion not the meat, as desire is in the mind not in the size, shape, or look of a dick.
I am interested to know how men feel about having had a physical part of themselves taken away. After all, the fore skin is there for a reason; every species on this earth that has a male member, has a fore skin. The reasons given for cutting it off differ from culture to culture, but the urge to mutilate goes on and on.
To be continued…
Having been born during the second world war in Amsterdam, of Jewish parents, I was brought up with horror stories of suspected Jewish men and boys having their pants pulled down on the street to make sure of their lack of foreskin, and then shipped off to concentration camps. (The movie director, Roman Polanski, survived in the Warsaw ghetto by making fake foreskins for his fellow sufferers)
Now I’m living in Australia where most men seem to be circumcised (don’t ask me how I know), when I ask questions of men about their fore skins, I find that most have never thought about it. In my research, only gay men, seeing other male members to compare with their own, seem to have a strong feeling about not having a fore skin, but every man I’ve mentioned it to has been interested in talking about it to me, and not at all in a suggestive way, but purely a philosophical one, which I can’t say for their women, who presume to know about their man’s feelings about his male member. Also the women think that I’m asking questions of the man for flirty reasons, and start point scoring on how many dicks they’ve seen. Such are the difficulties in research of this kind. The women who had experienced different dick's related some differences of physical aspect such as fore skins creating more lubrication and feeling softer. I say, what does it matter anyway, it’s the motion not the meat, as desire is in the mind not in the size, shape, or look of a dick.
I am interested to know how men feel about having had a physical part of themselves taken away. After all, the fore skin is there for a reason; every species on this earth that has a male member, has a fore skin. The reasons given for cutting it off differ from culture to culture, but the urge to mutilate goes on and on.
To be continued…
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

